BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE PERESTROIKA: MEMPERBARUI LAHAN BAGI PERTUMBUHAN KINERJA KELEMBAGAAN PEMERINTAH

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: May 27, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v2i4.484

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Haris Faozan1

Abstract

Bureaucracy as a terminology began to be widely known after Max Weber (1864-1920) introduced a model of organization known as bureaucratic organization. In his elaboration, Weber states that the form of bureaucratic organization is a type of organization that most fits the characteristics of industrial society in the late 19th century, both public and private sectors. The bureaucratic structure has existed for almost 100 years and, of course, it now requires some adjustments here and there in order to make its existence intact as Max Weber intended in building such phenomenal theory of bureaucracy. The structure of quality public sector is the one able to adjust to endless challenges. Such adjustable structure will enable public sector performance to grow and proliferate optimally. It is, therefore, necessary to keep readjusting certain dimensions of such organizational structure
as complexity, formalization and centralization to the present conditions.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Faozan1, H. (2019). BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE PERESTROIKA: MEMPERBARUI LAHAN BAGI PERTUMBUHAN KINERJA KELEMBAGAAN PEMERINTAH. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 2(4), 02. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v2i4.484
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  3. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

Atmosudirdjo, P., (1996), Teori Organisasi dalam Ilmu Administrasi. Jakarta, STIA-LAN

Press.

David, F. R., (2005), Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (10th edition), Prentice-Hall

Faozan, H., (2004), Mengoptimalkan Key Enablers of Innovation sebagai Key Leverages

Reformasi Birokrasi (sebuah tinjauan dari perspektif organization development), dalam

Beberapa Catatan Mengemban Misi Reformasi Birokrasi dan Administrasi Negara pada

Pemerintahan Baru Pasca Pemilu 2004, Idup Suhady dan Sugiyanto (eds). Lembaga

Adminisrasi Negara, Jakarta.

Felsenthal, D.S., (1980), Applying The Redundancy Concept of Administrative Organization.

Public Administration Review, 40, 247-252.

Gie, K.K., Audit dan Penataan Kembali Organisasi Birokrasi, Kompas 26 Maret 2005.

Gies, D.L., Ott, J.S., and Shafritz, J.M., (1990), The Nonprofit Organization: Essential Reading.

Wadsworth Publishing Company. Belmont, CA.

Golembiewski, R.T. (1969). Organization Development in The Public Sector: Perspective on

Theory and Practice, Public Administration Review, 29, 367-377.

Hatry, H.P., (1978), The Status of Productivity Measurement in The Public Sector, Public

Administration Review, 38, 28-33.

Heuer, M., (1999), Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness: A Literature Review, Washington

DC, Innovation Network, Inc.

Knauft, E.B., Berger, R.A., and Gray, S.T., (1991), Profiles of Excellence, San Francisco, Jossey-

Bass Publisher.

Letts, C.W., Ryan, W.P. and Grossman, A., (1999), High Performance Nonprofit Organizations,

New York, John Wiley & Son.

Li, Ping, (2002), Thoughts on The Enhancement of China’s Governmental Administrative

Efficiency After The Entrance Into WTO with Views on Reform in China’s Government

Leadership System, Chinese Public Administration Review, 1/1 (Jan/Mar 2002).

Lubis, S.B.H dan Huseini, M., (1987), Teori Organisasi: Suatu Pendekatan Makro. Jakarta,

Pusat Antar Universitas-Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Universitas Indonesia.

Picker, L.A., (1992), The Vision Thing, The Baltimore Sun. July 13, 1992.

Prawiranegara, F., Usulan untuk MENPAN: Restrukturisasi dan Korupsi, Kompas 24 Maret

United States General Accounting Office, (2003), Result-oriented Government: Shaping The

Government to Meet 21st Century Challenges. A Report to the Subcommittee on Civil Service

and Agency Organization, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representative,

Washington, DC.

Xia, Shuzhang, (1996), Studies on Governmental Administrative Efficiency, Zhongshan

University Press.

Ziblat, D. and O’Dwyer, C., (2003), Does Decentralization Make Government More Efficient and

Effective?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,

Philadelphia Marriot Hotel, Philadelphia, August 28-31, 2003.