AMBIGUITAS PENGUJIAN TERHADAP PERATURAN DAERAH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Law No 32 Year 2004 about Local Government offers local government wide authority to manage and regulate their citizens’ interests and aspiration. Correspondingly, local government with local representatives formulates local regulations (Perda). In terms of the type and level as pointed out in the Law No 10 Year 2004 regarding Regulation Formulation, Perda represents the lowest level law. Therefore, Perda holds more afflictions than any other laws in the sense that it has to be in accordance with the higher level laws. This condition often causes unexpected snags in the local autonomy implementation. Up to a certain degree, disharmony with the higher level laws is unavoidable due to conflicts of interest. With regard to local regulation annulations, Law No 32 Year 2004 Article 145 verse 3 states that local regulation annulation is regulated by Presidential Regulation (Perpres). In practice, local regulations are annulled by Internal Affair Ministerial Regulation (Permendagri). Substantial inconsistency between Perda and the central government regulation as well as the regulation examination incongruous with the Law No 32 Year 2004 Article 145 verse 3 instigates ambiguity which should be eliminated in order that local autonomy performs properly.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Asshiddiqie J. Hak Menguji (Toetsingrsecht) yang Dimiliki Hakim dalam Sistem Hukum
Indonesia.
Hoessein B. Produk Hukum Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah dan Tugas Pembantuan,
Makalah dipresentasikan dalam FGD-DPRD DKI Jakarta, Shangrilla Hotel 28
September 2007, Jakarta.
Jawa Pos, Kamis, 24 April 2008, http://www.jawapos.com/index.php?act=detail_c&d=
;
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 79 Tahun 2005 tentang Pedoman Pembinaan dan
Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah.
Prasojo E. dkk. 2006. Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah: Antara Model Demokrasi Lokal &
Efisiensi Struktural. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi –Fisip UI.
Ranggawidjaja R. 1998. Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-undangan Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar
Maju.
Sinar Harapan, Jumat, 25 Oktober 2007, http:/www.sinarharapan.co.id/berita/0710/26/
nas05/html;
Suara Merdeka, Senin, 02 Mei 2005, http://www.suaramerdeka.comharian/0505/02/
nas01,htm.
Undang-Undang No. 4 tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman;
Undang-Undang No.14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung sebagaimana telah diubah
dengan Undang-Undang No. 5 tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonseia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2004 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundangundangan.