E-Government Transformation in Central Lombok Regency: Evaluation Based on the CIPP Model
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation of e-government in Central Lombok Regency by examining the gap between planned objectives and actual outcomes, using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model introduced by Stufflebeam. While e-government is often framed as a national-level policy, this study focuses on a concrete, time-bound local initiative the 2017–2022 E-Government Development Master Plan of Central Lombok which functions as a structured implementation program suitable for programmatic evaluation. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving key stakeholders, particularly the Central Lombok Communication and Information Office (Diskominfo). The context evaluation revealed a mismatch between the region digital goals and its limited institutional readiness, particularly in terms of infrastructure and public digital literacy. The input evaluation showed that while planning documents and budgets were prepared, gaps remained in human resources and training capacity, with only 18.75% of officials and 30.75% of staff familiar with basic ICT. The process evaluation highlighted inconsistencies between planned targets and implementation outcomes such as the low number of agencies connected to central servers and minimal public interaction with e-government platforms. Finally, the product evaluation indicated that the program’s objectives were only partially met, with persistent challenges in system integration, inter-agency coordination, and citizen uptake of services. The study concludes that improving cross-agency collaboration, enhancing digital capacity through training and education, and promoting public awareness are essential for advancing e-government outcomes in the region. The use of the CIPP model in this context offers a systematic lens to diagnose programmatic shortcomings and generate actionable recommendations for future policy implementation.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.