ASPEK ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMEN PERBATASAN NEGARA
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The management of development in our border issues, which to date has not been optimal, is a crucial issue in Indonesia today. This internal problem and the possibility of neighboring countries claiming part of our national territory have increasingly turned this issue into a priority for the Indonesian government. This article discusses our limited capacity to manage and protect its boundaries which will have real impacts to both internally and externally. This article argues that
the complicated character of the national border issue, which is related to various types of threat, the wider field of national security, limited resources and the perception of threats, requires a more comprehensive policy framework. Internally, the effective management of national territorial boundaries will not only strengthen nation-state building but also contribute to the creation of regional security. This can be achieved by establishing cooperation with the relevant neighboring states. But, of course, we must also be able to take cognizance of various other dimensions, such as the economic, social, legal and diplomatic fields in managing our national borders.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Pernyataan ketua Umum Partai Amanat Nasional, Soetrisno Bachir sebagaimana dikutip dari harian KOMPAS,
“Isu Perbatasan Bukan Hanya Pulau Terluarâ€, 13 Februari 2006.
Dalam khasanah konseptual, istilah ini kerap merupakan terjemahan dari istilah frontier, boundary dan border.
Menurut Duska Knecevic Hocevar, ketiga istilah ini sering dimaknakan sama, yakni sebuah garis perbatasan
wilayah antar negara berdasarkan hukum internasional. Sejatinya, ketiga istilah ini memiliki makna berbeda
yang tidak hanya mencakup ruang geografis tetapi juga bermakna simbolik, etnisitas, dan politik. Lihat
Duska Knecevic Hocevar (2000) Studying International Borders in Geography and Anthropology: Paradigmatic and
Conceptual Relations. Dalam Geografski Zbornik. Vol.30, hlm.85-92
Lihat buku putih pertahanan RI, Ministry of Defence (2003). Defending The Country Entering the 21st Century.
Jakarta: Ministry of Defence, hlm.24-25.
Pembahasan lebih lanjut mengenai lima dimensi keamanan ini, lihat Barry Buzan (1998). Security: A New
Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
Lihat Kari Laitinen (2004). Reflecting the Security Border in the Post-Cold War Context, dalam
http://www.gmu.edu/academic/ijps/vol6_2/Laitinen.htm, accessed 25 jan 2006.
Lihat misalnya, Anthony McGrew (2000). Power Shift: From National Government to Global Governance.
Dalam David held ed. A Globalizing World ?: Culture, Economics and Politics. London: Routledge, hlm.127-168.
Lihat Stewart Patrick (2006). Weak States and Global Threats: Fact or Fiction. Dalam The Washington Quarterly,
Vol.29, No.2, hlm.27-53.
Lihat “Banten Minta batas Wilayah Kepulauan Seribuâ€, harian KOMPAS, 28 Maret 2006.
Lihat misalnya, Julian Saurin (1995) The End of International Relations ? The State and International Theory In
The Age of Globalization. Dalam John MacMillan, Andrew Linklater. Boundaries In Question: New Directions In
International Relations. London: Pinter Publishers, hlm. 244-261.
Mengenai dinamika konsep kedaulatan, lihat misalnya Daniel Philpott (2001). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How
Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, hlm.5-10.
Lihat Kari Laitinen (2004).ibid.
Mengenai hal ini lihat misalnya Mike Bowker, Robin Brown (1993). From Cold War to Collapse: Theory and World
Politics In The 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, hlm.2.
Dikutip dalam Jutta Welds (1996). Constructing National Interests. Dalam European Journal of International
Relations. Vol.2. No.3, hlm.275-318.
Robert I. Rotberg (2004). The Failure and Collapse of Nation-States: Breakdown, Prevention, and Repair. Dalam
Robert I. Rotberg ed. When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, hlm.1-
Merujuk pada penjelasan Sorensen, negara kuat ditunjukkan dengan institusi dan mekanisme politik yang
sudah matang, kinerja ekonomi yang baik, pengelolaan wilayah teritorial yang baik, tata kelola pemerintah
yang juga baik, dan identitas nasional yang kuat. Lihat Georg Sorensen (1996) Individual Security and
National Security: The State Remains the Principal Problem. Dalam jurnal Security Dialogue. Vol27. No.4.
hlm.375-390.
Ibid.
Lihat misalnya, Richard Ullman (1983). Redefining Security. Dalam International Security. Vol.8.No.1, Ole
Waever (1989). European Security-Problems of Research on Non-Military Aspects. Copenhagen Papers No.1.
Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, , Barry Buzan (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for
International Security Studies in the Post Cold War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Helga Haftendorn
(1991). The Security Puzzle: Theory Building and Discipline in International Security. Dalam International
Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35. No.1, Muthiah Alagappa (1998). Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational
Practices. California: Stanford University Press, Benyamin Miller (2001). The Concept of Security: Should it Be
Redefined. Dalam The Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol.24.No.2, Sean Kay (2004).Globalization, Power and
Security. Dalam Security Dialogue. Vol.35. No.1.
Lihat Elke Krahmann (2005). From State to Non-State Actors: The Emergence of Security Governance. Dalam
Elke Krahmann. New Threats and New Actors in International Security. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, hlm. 3-
“Terorisme: Segitiga Maut Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailandâ€, harian KOMPAS, 1 April 2006.
Ibid
Sebagaimana ditulis harian New York Times, July 2005. Dikutip dalam Stewart Patrick (2006), hlm.34.
Penegasan kata-kata tercetak tebal dilakukan oleh penulis untuk kepentingan makalah ini.
Dikutip dari Caroline Thomas (1991). New Directions in Thinking about Security in the Third World. Dalam
Ken Booth ed. New Thinking about Strategy and International Security. London: Harper Collins
Academic.hlm.269.
Lihat Harian KOMPAS, 10 Maret 2006, hlm. 21 dan 25.
Rizal Sukma (2005) War will never solve our problem, dalam The Jakarta Post, 21 Maret 2005