DAMPAK DESENTRALISASI FISKAL TERHADAP OUTPUT, PENDAPATAN, KESEMPATAN KERJA, DAN KELEMBAGAAN KOTA BANDUNG
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Bandung City as the Jakarta’s buffer and the Capital City of West Java has attracted immigrants which result in the increasing number of its population. This phenomenon has led to growing unemployment rate. Fiscal decentralization is believed to be able to solve the problem. In this study, the writer wants to investigate the impacts of budget allocation on some sectors to Bandung City
output, income, employment, and the institution. Input-output and descriptive analyses are deployed in analyzing the data. The result proves that hotel and communication sectors have a significant role in Bandung economy. Their multiplier effect and linkage are high. The impact of fiscal decentralization on those sectors on output and income is high. However, Bandung City institution tends to be inefficient in budget allocation as well as at operational level.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Carbonara, Emanuela. 2000. Corruption and Decentralization. WP 342/83-Dipartimento di
Scienze Economiche, Bologna.
Lin, J. and Z. Liu. 2000. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China. Economic
Development and Cultural Change 49 (1): 1-22.
Pardede, Ratlan. 2004. Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi
Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara dan Kota Medan: Aplikasi Model Input-Output. Disertasi Doktor
pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Prud’homme. 1995. The Dangers of Decentralization. World Bank Economic Review 9.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1997. Corruption and Development. Proceedings of the Annual Bank
Conference on Development Economics. Washington DC: World Bank.
Saefudin. 2005. Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Kinerja Perekonomian dan Kelembagaan
di Provinsi Riau. Thesis pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Tanzi, Vito. 1996. Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and
Macroeconomic Aspects. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, M.
Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds.), 295-316. Washington DC: World Bank.
Vazquez, Jorge Martinez and Robert M. McNab. 1994. Corruption, Governmental Activities
and Markets. IMF Working Paper 94/99. Washington, D.C. International Monetary
Fund.
_______. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth. Working Paper #1-01. January
International Studies Program. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Dari
http://isp-aysps.gsu.edu/papers/ispwp0101.pdf
Yudhoyono, Susilo Bambang. 2004. Kebijakan Fiskal Indonesia: Dinamika, Permasalahan, dan
pilihan. Brighten Press, Bogor.
Zhang, Tao dan Heng-fu Zou. 1997. Fiscal Decentralization, the Composition of Public
Spending, and Regional Growth in India. Development Research Group Working Paper.
Washington DC: World Bank.