KAJIAN DAN SOLUSI TEORI DAN PERILAKU ORGANISASI ATAS KORUPSI

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: May 27, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v2i3.456
Keywords:
Agency theory Social cotract theory Organizational structure & organizational culture

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Rizky Dermawan Soemanagara,

Abstract

What creates corruption? How to solve the matter? This article attempts to uncover the radix of and offers solutions to reduce corruption from the perspective of organization theory and organization behaviour. Several key points are addressed such organizational structure and organizational culture. The agency theory and “an extended†social contract theory are used as main ideas to describe the historical, organizational key factors to the creation of corruption

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Soemanagara, R. D. (2019). KAJIAN DAN SOLUSI TEORI DAN PERILAKU ORGANISASI ATAS KORUPSI. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 2(3), 02. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v2i3.456
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  3. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

Dermawan, R., (2003), Teori Perwakilan: Suatu Pembangunan Teori Melalui Pendekatan

Naturalistik-Filosofis, Naskah Buku Tidak Diterbitkan, Bandung.

Fukuyama, F., (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity, Edisi

Terjemahan, Trust: Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran 2002, Yogyakarta,

Penerbit Qalam.

Jaffe, D., (2001), Organizational Theory; Tension and Change, Singapore, McGraw-Hill Higher

Education.

Jensen, M., C., and Meckling. W. H., (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior,

Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Oktober, p.

-360.

Jones, G., R., (2001), Organizational Theory: Text and Cases, Third Edition, New Jersey

Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River.

Kreitner, R., dan Kinicki, A., (1998), Organizational Behavior, 4th Edition, New York, The

McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Martin J., dan M., Powers, (1983), Truth or Corporate Propaganda: The Value of a Good War

Story, di L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan dan T. C. Dandridge (eds), Organizational

Symbolism, No. 1. JAI Press.

Robbins. S. P, 2001, Organizational Behavior, 9th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle

River, New Jersey.

Rollinson. D, dan A. Broadfield, 2002, Organizational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated

Approach, Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex. Great Britain.

Sathe. V, 1983, Implications of Corporate Culture: A Managers Guide to Action, Organizational

Dynamics, American Management Association (Autumn)

Weber. M, 1978, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Berkeley

University of California Press. California.