PARADOKS ORGANISASIONAL: DILEMA MANAJERIAL DALAM PEMILIHAN ALOKASI SUMBER DAYA ORGANISASI (STUDI KASUS ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK PENDIDIKAN TINGGI
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Resource allocation resolution is essential for achieving organizational goals. It is related to inter-actor social interaction, in the form of position bargaining. In this case, analysis on educational policy should be based upon the main framework that education is public goods. When education is so-called public goods, all decisions on educational policy are thought to be within political domain. Thus, its administration becomes politically bound public administration. This research applies organizational analysis. The writer chose this tool analysis by reason of the fact that all activities to accomplish vision and missions carried out by social actors are within organizational span. Balancing organizational paradox can be attained by linking it to organizational vision, through system and organization structure approaches. The system of higher education is believed to be loosely coupled system. One thing to be noted is that the education system does not tightly bind higher education institutions. There is no consensus between universities and education system.
There is no tight internal bound within organization, but one goal commitment, i.e. educational performance.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Barney JB. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of
Management. Vol. 32. No. 10. 99-121.
Becker GS. 1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to
Education 3rd Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bell. D. 1973. The Coming of Post Industrial Society. Penguin Books Ltd. New York.
Cohn. E. 1979. The Economics of Education. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company..
Fukuyama F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. (Edisi
Terjemahan) Trust: Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran 2002. Yogyakarta:
Penerbit Qalam.
Gunawan WA. 2008. Hubungan Antara Anggaran dan Kinerja Pendidikan. Tugas Artikel yang
Tidak Dipublikasikan. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Hanson ME. 1991. Educational Administration and Organizational Behavior Third Edition.
Massachusets: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Hanushek EA. 1986. The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.
Journal of Economic Literature 24: 1141-1177.
Jaffe D. 2001. Organizational Theory: Tension and Change. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Higher
Education,.
Jones GR. 2001. Organizational Theory: Text and Cases. Third Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Kakabadse A. 1983. The Politics of Management. London: Gower.
Kreitner R. and Kinicki A. 2001. Organizational Behavior Fifth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Lee R. and Lawrence P. 1991. Politics at Work. London: Stanley Thorn.
Merton R. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Illinois: Free Press.
Penrose. E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley & Sons. New York.
Pfeffer J. and Salancik GR. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence
Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Rice and Bishoprick. 1971. Conceptual Models of Organization. New York: Appleton-
Century-Crofts. Meredith Corporation.
Rinehard G. 1993. Quality Educational: Applying Philosophy of DW Edwards Deming to
Transform the Educational System. Milwaukee Wisconsin: ASCQ Quality Press.
Ritzer G, 1980. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science . (Edisi Terjemahan) Sosiologi Ilmu
Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Robbins SP. 2001. Organizational Behavior 9th Edition. Prentice Hall International Inc.
Rollinson D. and Broadfield. A. 2002. Organizational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated
Approach. Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.
Sallis E. 1993. Total Quality Management in Education. London: Cogan Page Limited.
Schultz TW. 1961. Investment in Human Capital. The American Economics Review No. 51
March 1961.
Tilly C. and Tilly C. 1998. Work Under Capitalism. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Rancangan Undang-undang Badan Hukum Pendidikan (http://dikti.org/1262007125956
naskah_uji_publik_ruu_bhp-_5_des_2007.pdf)
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2007.
(http://www.unissula.ac.id/v1/download/Peraturan/PP_19_2005_STANDAR_NAS_
PENDDKN.PDF/diakses 1 Oktober 2007)
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan
Nasional. 2007. (http://www.prp-Indonesia.org/component/option,com_doqment/
task,files.download/cid,12/diakses, 1 Oktober 2007).