Septiana Dwiputrianti


This paper examines and develops the criteria to measure the effectiveness of government auditing reports to enhance the transparency and public accountability from international literatures related to public administration and government auditing. The criteria can be divided into 2 (two) parts, namely: criteria related to information in the audit reports and criteria related to
acting on information in the audit reports. The first part consists of criteria related to the quality of information and the audit reports content. The second part consists of criteria related to communication of audit report information and acting on audit information. The research employed case study approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods in Indonesia. The study
surveyed and interviewed key informants including the management of the audit institutions, government auditors, the audited entities (local and central governments) and the Members of Parliament. By examining the reformation legal system for government auditing and comparing this with the best practices from the auditing literatures that formulated in criteria of government
auditing, the study shows that the Indonesian government auditing has not completely addressed the real needs of public accountability and transparency during this reformation era. This study argues that follow up of the audit findings are the major criteria in terms of acting on information. The study recommends a more effective strategy should be adopted to develop profesionalism and
integrity and to improve qualifications of auditors with different educational background, through education, training and development to move from financial auditing to performance auditing in the future. In addition, increasing audit resources in the local regions is necessary. The last recommendation is to provide better communication and discussion about implementing audit
recommendations and following-up audit reports.


How to Cite
Dwiputrianti, S. (2019). EFEKTIFITAS LAPORAN HASIL TEMUAN PEMERIKSAAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN REFORMASI TRANPARANSI FISKAL DAN AKUNTABILITAS SEKTOR PUBLIK (2001-2008) DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 5(4), 02. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v5i4.442



Babu, R. 2000. Some Thoughts on Objectives and Effectiveness of Audit. Asian Journal of

Government Auditing.

Barrett, P. 1996. Some Thoughts about The Roles, Responsibility and Future Scope of Auditors-

Genera'. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(4):137-46.

Becker, S. and Bryman, A. 2004. Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice:

Themes, Methods and Approaches. Bristol, England: Policy Press.

Bertsk, J. 2000. Trust in Government Ethics Measures in OECD Countries. Paris: Organization

for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Bovens, M. 2005. Public Accountability in E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn and C. Pollitt (eds). The Oxford

Handbook of Public Management. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brooks, R.C. and Pariser, D.B. 1995. Audit Recommendation Follow-up Systems: A Survey of

The States. Public Budgeting & Finance, 15(1):72-83. GOI, 2004b.

Devas, N. 1989. Financing Local Government in Indonesia. Ohio: Ohio University, Center for

International Studies.

Eisenhardt, K.M. 2002. Building Theories from Case Study Research. in A.M. Huberman, and

Mile, M.B. (ed.). The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. London: Sage.

Ferguson, A. and Rafuse, B. 2004. Who Audits The Auditor?: The International Peer

Review of The Office of The Auditor General of Canada. International Journal of

Government Auditing. 31(4):10-15.

Funnell, W. and Cooper, K. 1998. Public Sector Accounting and Accountability in

Australia. UNSW Press, Sydney.

Gauthier, S.J., 2005. Governmental Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting, Government

Chicago: Finance Officers Association.

Gray, A., Jenkins, B., and Segsworth, B. 1993. Budgeting, Auditing and Evaluation: Function

and Integration in Seven Governments., New Brunswich, USA and London: Transaction


Healy, P.M. and Palepu, K.G. 2001. Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and

The Capital Markets: A Review of The Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of

Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3):405-40.

INTOSAI. 1996. News in Brief . International Journal of Government Auditing, 23(2):3-6.

Kaltenbach, E. 1993. The Audit of Secret Expenditures. International Journal of Government

Auditing, 20(3):9-12.

Krishnamoorthy, G., Wright, A. and Cohen, J. 2002. Audit Committee Effectiveness and

Financial Reporting Quality: Implications for Auditor Independence. Australian

Accounting Review, 12(3):3-13.

Larson, J.S. 1983. Fraud in Government Programs: A Secondary Analysis. Southern Review of

Public Administration, 7(3).

Lynn, G. 2005. A Dictionary of Accounting and Auditing: 10.000 + Accounting and

Auditing Terms Currently Used in The USA, UK, Canada, and Australia: One Sentence

Definition, Xlibris. Philadelphia.

Manheim, J.B., Rich, R.C., Willnat, L. and Brians, C.L. 2008. Empirical Political Analysis:

Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods 7th Edition. New York: Pearson Education


Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. California: Sage.

Marsidi, 2002. It Is The Right Time For Parliament To Be More Critical. The Audit Forum,


Mazur, J., Révész, J., Vella, B. and Havens, H. 2005. Guidelines on Audit Quality. International

Journal of Government Auditing, 32(2):10-14.

McKernan, J. 1996. Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for The

Reflective Pracititioner, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.

McNabb, D.E. 2004. Research Methods for Political Science. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Mulgan, R. 2001. Auditors-General: Cuckoos in The Managerialist Nest?. Australian Journal of

Public Administration, 60(2):24-34.

Nasution, A. 2006. The Role of The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia (BPK-RI) in

Promoting Transparency and Accountability of The State Finance. The Audit Forum, IX(2):6-

Nicoll, P. 2005. Audit in Democracy. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited


Nosworthy, B.A. 1999. Role of the Auditor General in Public Accountability: Some Issues,

dissertation.com. Austria.

Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd Edition. London: Sage.

Ramos, M.J. 2006. Practitioner's Guide to GAAS 2006. New York: Wiley, Hoboken.

Ritchie, J., and Spencer, L. 2002. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research, in A.M.

Huberman, and Miles, B. (ed.). The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. London: Sage.

Russell, J.P. and Regel, T., 2000. After the Quality Audit: Closing The Loop on The Audit

Process. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality (ASQ) Press.

Santiso, C. 2008. Eyes Wide Shut? Reforming and Defusing Checks and Balances in Argentina.

Public Administration & Development, 28(1):67-84.

Schwartz, R. and Mayne, J., 2005. Quality Matters: Seeking Confidence in Evaluating, Auditing,

and Performance Reporting. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Soedibyo. 2003. Problems in Communicating Results of Our Works, The Audit Forum,


______. 2006. We Still Lack of Professional Auditors, The Audit Forum, IX(1):25-28.

Sproull, N.L. 1988. Handbook of Research Methods: A Guide For Practitioners and Students in

The Social Science. London: The Scarecrow Press, Inc..

Tandon, B.N., Sudharsanam, S. and Sundharabahu, S. 2007. Handbook of Practical Auditing.

New Delhi: S.Chand and Company Ltd.

Taylor, J. 1996. What Should Be The Role of The Auditor General in The Context of Managerialist

Government and New Public Management?. Australian Journal of Public Administration,


Thai, K.V. 1992. Government Auditing. in J. Rabin (ed.). Public Administration and Public

Policy: Handbook of Public Budgeting. New York: Maree Dekker.

Tokyo Declaration. 1985. Tokyo Declaration: Guidelines on Public Accountability. 3rd

Assembly and 2nd International Seminar of ASOSAI, Asian Organization of Supreme

Audit Institutions, Tokyo, Japan.

United Nations. 1980. Public Auditing Techniques for Performance Improvement: Report of the

United nations/INTOSAI Seminar on Government Auditing. Department of Technical

Cooperation for Development United Nations, New York.

US GAO. 2003. Government Auditing Standards 2003 Revision. The United States

Government Accountability Office, Washington D.C.

Widodo. 2004. Secrecy and Publicity, The Audit Forum, VII(No.1):19-24.

Surat Kabar Nasional

Kontan, 10 Maret 2007. 'Cukup satu pemeriksa ', Jakarta.

Koran Tempo, 12 March 2007. 'Hasil audit disclaimer (No opinion of audit reports)',


Peraturan Perundang-undangan

UUD 1945: Naskah Asli dan Perubahannya Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta: Pusaka Pergaulan.

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara,


Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan

Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara, Penerbit Pustaka Pergaulan,


Undang Undang Keuangan Negara: Dalam Satu Paket Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Tim

Pustaka Pergaulan.

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa

Keuangan, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta. Diakses dari

http://www.bpk.go.id/undang/UU_15_BPK.pdf (3 Maret 2007).

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 103 Tahun 2001 tentang Kedudukan, Tugas, Fungsi,

Wewenang Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Lembaga Pemerintah Non Departemen,


Peraturan BPK Nomor 1 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara.

Jakarta: BPK RI.