ARTI PENTING EVALUASI POLITIK FORMULASI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK BAGI KELANGSUNGAN PEMERINTAHAN
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Is the performance of government good or substandard? Can government resoluteness be maintained? Public policy becomes one of the indicators to asses government performance because, through public policy, citizens can appraise the government’s vision, mission, goal, and objectives. However, in practice, a lot of cases show that the government’s policies have not met the citizen’s expectations, interests and needs. One of the causes is estimated to roof from the government or policy makers negligence toward the political evaluation of public policy formulation. What does political evaluation mean? How is the political evaluation interrelated with government resoluteness? The writer will discuss the issues in this article.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Dunn, N. William. 1999. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik - Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta:
Gadjah Mada University Press.
Dye, Thomas R. 1981. Introduction to Policy. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Frederickson, H. George. 1999. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Fransisco: The
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Jackson, Karl D. 1978. Bureaucratic Polity: A Theoritical Framework for the Analysis of Power
and Communication in Indonesia, dalam Jackson, Karl D. dan Pye, Lucian W. “Political
Power and Communication in Indonesiaâ€. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Karim, M. R. A. 1999. Reengineering The Public Service Leadership and Change in an Electronic
Age. Malaysia: Pelanduk Publications.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1980. Proses Penetapan Kebijakan - Edisi Kedua (terjemahan). Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Nachmias, David & Nachmias Chava. 1987. Research Methods in The Social Science - Third
Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Putra, Fadillah. 2001. Paradigma Kritis Dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar.
Vries, Michiel S. 1999. Calculated Choices in Policy-Making: The Theory and Practice of Impact
Assesment. USA: ST. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Wahab, Solichin A. 1990. Analisis Kebijakan: Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijakan Negara
- Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Jurnal dan Makalah
de Leon, Peter, 1994; “The Policy Science Redux: New Roads to Post-Positivismâ€, Policy
Studies Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1.
Dwiyanto, Agus, 2001; “Catatan Kuliah Evaluasi Kebijakan Publikâ€, Pascasarjana,
Program Studi Administrasi Negara, UGM.
Lele, Gabriel, 1999; “Postmodernisme dalam Pengembangan Wacana Formulasi
Kebijakanâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Vol. 3, No. 2, Fisip, UGM.
Purwanto, Erwan, 1995; “Bahan Kuliah Kebijakan Publikâ€, Fisipol, Universitas Gadjah
Mada, Yogyakarta
---------------------, 1997; “Kebijakan Otomotif di Indonesia 1966-1996: Memahami Konteks
Politik Proses Lahirnya Kebijakan Publikâ€, Tesis, MAP, UGM.