GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN BIROKRATIK VS MANAJERIAL DALAM ORGANISASI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

A l w i1 A l w i1

Abstract

The implementation of local autonomy policy influences the leadership model of local bureaucrats. The model of bureaucratic leadership, previously oriented more to the bureaucratic rules, changes to the managerial leadership leading to more efficient use of the organizational resources, including the human resources. The objective of local autonomy policy is to materialize, that is to accelerate the local development and public service delivery, good leadership as a precondition should be fulfilled. First, a leader should have a strong commitment. In addition, his orientation should be more on managerial skills rather than bureaucratic structure, as to focus on the achievement of development results. The practice of the effective managerial leadership model poses some key elements as guidance for the local autonomy bureaucrats. Such key elements include the objectives to be achieved, the necessary preventive actions to deal with crisis situation, the critical leadership actions to take into consideration, the expected results of leadership intervention, the follow-up steps to be taken, and the inclusion of other impending resources.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
A l w i1, A. l w i1. (2019). GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN BIROKRATIK VS MANAJERIAL DALAM ORGANISASI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 3(2), 02. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v3i2.429


Section
Articles

References

Allen, Kathleen E. 1998. Leadership in the Twenty-First Century. http://www.academy.

umd.edu/publication/klsdoes/21stcen.html. (30 Mei 2006)

Alwi. 2005. Kecil Itu Gesit: Visi Baru Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia. dalam

Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol. 2 No. 4 Tahun 2005, Bandung: STIA LAN Bandung.

Bennis, Warren G. 1981. Organizational Development and the Fate of Bureaucracy. dalam

Kramer, Fred A. 1981. Perspectives on Public Bureaucracy. (3rd). USA: Little, Brown &

Company.

Dwiyanto, Agus, dkk. 2002. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi

Kependudukan dan Kebijakan UGM.

Eliassen, Kjell A, and Kooiman, Jan. 1993. Introduction. dalam Eliassen, Kjell A, and

Kooiman, Jan, (Editor), Managing Public Organization: Lesson From Contemporary

European Experience, London: SAGE Publication.

Hory, Masaharu. 2002. Japanese Public Administration and its Adoption New Public

Management. Paper Presented to the Fifteenth Annual International Conference of the

Public Administration Theory Network, hosted by Cleveland State University,

Cleveland, Ohio, May 30 – June 1, 2002.

Hughes, Owen E. 1994. Public Management & Administration : an Introduction, Great Britain:

The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Hersey, Paul, & Dewey E. Johnson. 1997. Kepemimpinan Situasional dalam Organisasi

Multikultural. dalam Frances Hesselbein dkk. (editor) The Organization of the Future,

Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Newell, Charldean. 1993. On Being an Effective Local Management Manager. dalam Newell,

Charldean. The Effective Local Government Manager. (2nd Edition). USA: ICMA.

Robbins, Stephen P. & Coulter, Mary. 2002. Management. (7th Edition). USA: Prentice Hall.

Tjokroamidjojo, Bintoro. 2000. Good Governance : Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pembangunan.

Jakarta: UI-Press.

Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.