KUALITAS PELAYANAN PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Chairul Furqon

Abstract

Higher education institutions typify a social, formal institution encompassing internal and external relations among their stakeholder.s. At present, as free competition era endures, higher education institutions must be more responsive to their stakeholders, especially their internal stakeholders, i.e their students as their main asset. Therefore, identification of students’ perception toward institution’s performance is really imperative. This can be done through research on higher education institution’s service quality, where importance-performance analysis can be conducted from viewpoints: learning process, academic assistance, supporting educational resources, extracurricular activities, communication with institution administartors, and administrative services. Information on these aspects may become a gadget for evaluation. In the long run, it is expected to be able to revitalize higher education institutions to breed qualified graduates. Qualified
graduates which meet the business sector standard will eventually help develop the country’s competitiveness.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Furqon, C. (2019). KUALITAS PELAYANAN PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 4(4), 04. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v4i4.389


Section
Articles

References

Alzola LM and Robaina VP. 2005. SERVQUAL: Its Applicability in Electronic Commerce B2C.

The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 4. Milwaukee: American Society for

Quality.

Blose JE., William BT., and Leisa RF. 2005. Managing Service Quality Using Data Envelopment

Analysis. The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 2. Milwaukee: American

Society for Quality.

Douglas J, Alex D, & Barry B. 2006. Measuring Student Satisfaction at a UK university.

Quality Assurance in Education Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3. Emerald Group Publishing

Limited.

Fandy Tj. 2002. Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Andi.

_______. 2005. Brand Management and Strategy. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Iskandar H. dan Dadang S. 2005. Kualitas Pelayanan pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas

Kuningan. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi & Manajemen, Vol. 1, No. 1. Fakultas Ekonomi

Universitas Kuningan.

Kotler P. and Karen FAF. 1995. Strategic Marketing for Educational Institution. Second Ed.

Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

_______, and Keller KL. 2006. Marketing Management. Pearson International Edition. New

Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kusnendi A., Heny H., Furqon C. 2007. Kualitas Pelayanan pada Universitas Pendidikan

Indonesia (survey tentang harapan mahasiswa dan kenyataan yang dirasakan). Laporan

Penelitian Internal UPI.

Lovelock CH. 2002. Service Marketing. Second Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:

Prentice Hal Inc.

Parasuraman A. Zeithaml VA., and Berry LL. 1990. Delivering Quality Service Balancing

Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York: The Free Press A Division of

Macmillan Inc.

Saravanan R. and Rao KSP. 2007. Service Quality from the Customer's Perspective: An

Empirical Investigation. The Quality Management Journal, Vol. 14, Iss. 3. Milwaukee:

American Society for Quality.

Smith G., Smith A., and Clarke A.. 2007. Evaluating service quality in universities: a service

department perspective. Quality Assurance in Education Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3. Emerald

Group Publishing Limited.