ASPEK ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMEN PERBATASAN NEGARA

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Anak Agung Banyu Perwita

Abstract

The management of development in our border issues, which to date has not been optimal, is a crucial issue in Indonesia today. This internal problem and the possibility of neighboring countries claiming part of our national territory have increasingly turned this issue into a priority for the Indonesian government. This article discusses our limited capacity to manage and protect its boundaries which will have real impacts to both internally and externally. This article argues that
the complicated character of the national border issue, which is related to various types of threat, the wider field of national security, limited resources and the perception of threats, requires a more comprehensive policy framework. Internally, the effective management of national territorial boundaries will not only strengthen nation-state building but also contribute to the creation of regional security. This can be achieved by establishing cooperation with the relevant neighboring states. But, of course, we must also be able to take cognizance of various other dimensions, such as the economic, social, legal and diplomatic fields in managing our national borders.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Perwita, A. A. B. (2019). ASPEK ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMEN PERBATASAN NEGARA. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 6(3), 04. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v6i3.367


Section
Articles

References

Pernyataan ketua Umum Partai Amanat Nasional, Soetrisno Bachir sebagaimana dikutip dari harian KOMPAS,

“Isu Perbatasan Bukan Hanya Pulau Terluarâ€, 13 Februari 2006.

Dalam khasanah konseptual, istilah ini kerap merupakan terjemahan dari istilah frontier, boundary dan border.

Menurut Duska Knecevic Hocevar, ketiga istilah ini sering dimaknakan sama, yakni sebuah garis perbatasan

wilayah antar negara berdasarkan hukum internasional. Sejatinya, ketiga istilah ini memiliki makna berbeda

yang tidak hanya mencakup ruang geografis tetapi juga bermakna simbolik, etnisitas, dan politik. Lihat

Duska Knecevic Hocevar (2000) Studying International Borders in Geography and Anthropology: Paradigmatic and

Conceptual Relations. Dalam Geografski Zbornik. Vol.30, hlm.85-92

Lihat buku putih pertahanan RI, Ministry of Defence (2003). Defending The Country Entering the 21st Century.

Jakarta: Ministry of Defence, hlm.24-25.

Pembahasan lebih lanjut mengenai lima dimensi keamanan ini, lihat Barry Buzan (1998). Security: A New

Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher.

Lihat Kari Laitinen (2004). Reflecting the Security Border in the Post-Cold War Context, dalam

http://www.gmu.edu/academic/ijps/vol6_2/Laitinen.htm, accessed 25 jan 2006.

Lihat misalnya, Anthony McGrew (2000). Power Shift: From National Government to Global Governance.

Dalam David held ed. A Globalizing World ?: Culture, Economics and Politics. London: Routledge, hlm.127-168.

Lihat Stewart Patrick (2006). Weak States and Global Threats: Fact or Fiction. Dalam The Washington Quarterly,

Vol.29, No.2, hlm.27-53.

Lihat “Banten Minta batas Wilayah Kepulauan Seribuâ€, harian KOMPAS, 28 Maret 2006.

Lihat misalnya, Julian Saurin (1995) The End of International Relations ? The State and International Theory In

The Age of Globalization. Dalam John MacMillan, Andrew Linklater. Boundaries In Question: New Directions In

International Relations. London: Pinter Publishers, hlm. 244-261.

Mengenai dinamika konsep kedaulatan, lihat misalnya Daniel Philpott (2001). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How

Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, hlm.5-10.

Lihat Kari Laitinen (2004).ibid.

Mengenai hal ini lihat misalnya Mike Bowker, Robin Brown (1993). From Cold War to Collapse: Theory and World

Politics In The 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, hlm.2.

Dikutip dalam Jutta Welds (1996). Constructing National Interests. Dalam European Journal of International

Relations. Vol.2. No.3, hlm.275-318.

Robert I. Rotberg (2004). The Failure and Collapse of Nation-States: Breakdown, Prevention, and Repair. Dalam

Robert I. Rotberg ed. When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, hlm.1-

Merujuk pada penjelasan Sorensen, negara kuat ditunjukkan dengan institusi dan mekanisme politik yang

sudah matang, kinerja ekonomi yang baik, pengelolaan wilayah teritorial yang baik, tata kelola pemerintah

yang juga baik, dan identitas nasional yang kuat. Lihat Georg Sorensen (1996) Individual Security and

National Security: The State Remains the Principal Problem. Dalam jurnal Security Dialogue. Vol27. No.4.

hlm.375-390.

Ibid.

Lihat misalnya, Richard Ullman (1983). Redefining Security. Dalam International Security. Vol.8.No.1, Ole

Waever (1989). European Security-Problems of Research on Non-Military Aspects. Copenhagen Papers No.1.

Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, , Barry Buzan (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for

International Security Studies in the Post Cold War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Helga Haftendorn

(1991). The Security Puzzle: Theory Building and Discipline in International Security. Dalam International

Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35. No.1, Muthiah Alagappa (1998). Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational

Practices. California: Stanford University Press, Benyamin Miller (2001). The Concept of Security: Should it Be

Redefined. Dalam The Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol.24.No.2, Sean Kay (2004).Globalization, Power and

Security. Dalam Security Dialogue. Vol.35. No.1.

Lihat Elke Krahmann (2005). From State to Non-State Actors: The Emergence of Security Governance. Dalam

Elke Krahmann. New Threats and New Actors in International Security. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, hlm. 3-

“Terorisme: Segitiga Maut Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailandâ€, harian KOMPAS, 1 April 2006.

Ibid

Sebagaimana ditulis harian New York Times, July 2005. Dikutip dalam Stewart Patrick (2006), hlm.34.

Penegasan kata-kata tercetak tebal dilakukan oleh penulis untuk kepentingan makalah ini.

Dikutip dari Caroline Thomas (1991). New Directions in Thinking about Security in the Third World. Dalam

Ken Booth ed. New Thinking about Strategy and International Security. London: Harper Collins

Academic.hlm.269.

Lihat Harian KOMPAS, 10 Maret 2006, hlm. 21 dan 25.

Rizal Sukma (2005) War will never solve our problem, dalam The Jakarta Post, 21 Maret 2005