Systems Thinking dan System Dynamics Sebagai Suatu Pendekatan dalam Pengukuran Kinerja Pelayanan

Dr. Endang Wirjatmi Trilestari


Several dimensions of public service performance appraisal carried out in Indonesia, such as the Performance Accountability Report of Government Institution (LAKIP), Index of Human Resource Development, are still oriented to the internal and partial paradigm of parties and using a good governance paradigm is unavailable. Therefore, this paper is aimed at an approach of public service performance appraisal that can fulfill the requirements of good governance paradigm by using the systems thinking and system dynamics. This approach is generally used to solve argumentative problems. Compared with other mentioned approaches, systems thinking and system dynamics are more comprehensive in dealing the problems in the following ways: (1) the model resulted can cover all fundamental variables in terms of government and people perspectives used to solve a problem of detail complexity, (2) the approach can explain the involvement the essential variables to solve a problem of dynamic complexity, (3) Variables used are transformed into a model at the same time through soft variables, hard variables and performance variables. Therefore, the process can result in a comprehensive model of performance appraisal of which its success can be detected


Systems Thinking dan System Dynamics Sebagai Suatu Pendekatan dalam Pengukuran Kinerja Pelayanan

Full Text:



Ackerman, Hank & Kim van Oorschot. 2002. Developing a Balanced Scorecard with System

Dynamics, Proceedings of The XX International Conference, System Dynamics Society.

Palermo-Italy. 28 July–1 Augut 2002.

Armstrong, Michael & Baron, A. 1998. Performance Management: The New Realities. New York:

Institute of Personnel and Development.

Cassell, C. & Simon, G. 1998. Reflection on the Use of Qualitative Methods. dalam Cassell, C &

Simon, G. 1998. Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, A Practical

Guide. New York: Sage Publications.

Cave, Martin, Kogan, Maurice, Smith, Robert, Ed. 1990. Output and Performance Measurement in

Government: The State of the Art. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Checkland, P. & Scholes, J. 1990. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. New York: John Wiley &

Sons. Ltd.

------------, P.1999. Systems Thinking, System Practice Includes A 30-year Retrospective. New York:

John Wiley & Son Ltd.

Coyle, G. 1999. Qualitative Modeling In System Dynamics Or What Are The Wise Limits Of

Quantification? A Keynote Address to the Conference of the System Dynamics Society,

Wellington, New Zealand, 8 Cleycourt Road, Chrivenham, Swindon SN6 8EN, UK

tersedia pada: email: May. 1999.

Creswell, John W., 1994, Recearch Design Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches, Sage Publication,

Thousand Oaks.

Davidow, William H. & Bro Uttal. 1989. Total Customers Service The Ultimate Weapon. The Free

Press, New York.

Davis, Mark M. & Janelle Heineke. 2003. Managing Services, Using Technology to Create Value,

McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.

DeVrey, Catherine. 1994. Good Service is Good Business, 7 Simple Strategies for Success, Competitive

Edge Management Series, AIM.

Eccles, R. G. 1994. “Performance Measurement & Monitoring in Governmentâ€, Konferensi Feb ’95–

the Institute for International Research, Jurnal Public Management, Vol.76, No.9, 9

September 1994.

Epstein, P.D. 1988. Using Performance Measurement in Local Government, New York: National Civic

League Press.

Fahey, Liam, Robert M. Randall, Learning From The Future, Competitive Foresight scenarios,

Cases. Little Brown and Company, Boston, p. 2.

Farnham, D. & Horton, S. 1996. Managing The New Public Service. London: McMillan Press.

Flood, R.L. & Carson, E.R. 1988. Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and

Application of Systems Science. New York: Plenum Press.

------------,1999. Rethinking, The Fifth Discipline: Learning within the unknowable. London and New

York: Routledge.

Forrester, J.W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge – Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of

Technology Press.

Frederikson H.G.,1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Harmon, M.M. & Mayer, R.T. 1986. Organization Theory for Public Administration. Boston: Little,

Brown and Company.

Maani, Kambitz E.; Robert Y. Cavana, 2000. System Thinking and Modelling,Undestanding Change

and Complexity, Prentice Hall, New Zealand.

Mingers, J. & Gill, A. Ed. 1997. The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science

Methodologies: Multi Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Muhammadi, Erman Aminullah, Budhi Soesilo, 2001, Analisis Sistem Dinamis, Lingkungan Hidup,

Sosial, Ekonomi, Manajemen, UMJ Press, Jakarta,

O'Connor, Joseph & Ian Mc Dermott, 1997, System Thinking, Essential Skills for Creativity and

Problem Solving, Thorsons, London.

Peter Senge,1995. The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.

Robert E. Stake dalam Denzin, Norman K, Lincoln Yvanna S., 1994, Hand Book of Qualitative

Recearch, Sage Publications, New York.

Sterman, John D. 2000. Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New

York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.: 1-14

Sushil, System Dynamics, A Practical Approach for Managerial Problems, Wiley Eastern Limited,

New Dehli, 1993: 31.

Watt, Peter A., Local Government, Principle and Practice, A text for Risk Managers, Publisher is

assosiation with The institute of Risk Management by Witherby, 1996: 15

Zeithaml, V. A., et al., 1990Delivery Quality Service, Balancing Customer Perceptions. New York: The

Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Indexed by:




Jalan Cimandiri No. 34-38 Bandung


Powered by OJS (Open Jounal Systems)