Struktur dan Implementasi DP3 sebagai Sistem Penilaian Pekerjaan (Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Indonesian civil servants work under the principle of being “servants of the state and servants of the communityâ€. However, there is a long tradition of convoluted bureaucracy, poor public service deliveries, and inefficient government. The demand for better performance from civil service personnel comes both from national pressure and also from the need to be efficient as dictated by international trade and commerce. As with other developing countries, the government of Indonesia has had difficulty improving the quality of human resources, especially within the public sector. This difficulty does not stem only
from the human factor, but also from within the system itself. This article is a review of the Indonesian Civil Servants’ Performance Evaluation Program which is currently being used all over Indonesia as a means of evaluating civil servants’ performance. The main feature of the review will be analyzing the DP3 structure and its implementation. The review will also examine the strengths and weaknesses of the DP3 system followed by a series of practical recommendations for consideration by officials to modify the existing system.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Archer North and Associates. 1998. Performance Appraisal. Diakses: http://www.performanceappraisal.
com/intro.htm
Bernardin, H.J. and Beatty, R.W. 1984. Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work.
California: Kent Publishing Company.
Cummings, L.L. and Schwab, D.P. 1973. Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisal.
Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Departmen Penerangan Republik Indonesia. 1996. Indonesia 1996. An Official Book.
Galin, Amira. 1981. The Criteria Method of Objective Performance Appraisal. in Performance
Appraisal. Lansbury, R.D. (Ed). Melbourne: The Macmillan Company of Australia Pty Ltd.
Gill, Brian. 1998. Effective Performance Appraisals (Employee Evaluation). American Printer.
August, v221 n5 p72.
Hofstede, G.H. 1982. Cultural Pitfalls for the Dutch Expatriate in Indonesia. Jakarta: T.G.
International.
Kristiadi, J.B. 1992. Administrative Reform in Indonesia: Streamlining and Professionalizing the
bureaucracy. in Administrative Reform Toward Promoting Productivity in Bureaucratic
Performance. (Eds) vol 1: Zhang, Z., De Guzman, R.P., & Reforma, M.A. Eastern Regional
Organization for Public Administration (EROPA), p. 97-106.
Lansbury, R.D., and Prideaux, G.J. 1981. The Appraisal Interview and The Art of Feedback. in
Performance Appraisal. Lansbury, R.D. (Ed). Melbourne: The Macmillan Company of
Australia Pty Ltd
Latham, G.P., and Wexley, K.N. 1981. Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal.
Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Pamudji, Suparni. 1992. An Overview of Recent Administrative Reform in Indonesia. in
Administrative Reform Toward Promoting Productivity in Bureaucratic Performance. (Eds) vol 1:
Zhang, Z., De Guzman, R.P., & Reforma, M.A. Eastern Regional Organization for Public
Administration (EROPA), p. 93-96.
Pratt, Henry J. 1991. Principles of Effective Performance Management. Records Management
Quarterly. January, v25 n1 p28.
Scholtes, Peter R. 1999. Total Quality or Performance Appraisal: Choose One. Diakses dari
Stewart, V., and Stewart, A. 1977. Practical Performance Appraisal. England: Gower Press.
Widyahartono, Bob.1991. The Pancasila Way of Managing in Indonesia. In Management: Asian
Context. (Ed) Putti, Joseph M. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Dokumen
Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 8
Tahun 1974 Tentang Pokok-pokok Kepegawaian.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 1979 Tentang Penilaian Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Pegawai
Negeri Sipil.
Surat Edaran Kepala Badan Administrasi Kepegawaian Negara Nomor 02/SE/1980 Tentang
Penilaian Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Pegawai Negeri Sipil