ANTARA HARAPAN DAN REALITA: IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN ORGANISASI PERANGKAT DAERAH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study intends to describe the policy performance of the Government Regulation Number 41 Year 2007 on Local Government Agencies through five indicators: effectiveness, efficiency, sufficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness.
This is a descriptive case study conducted in the District of Konawe and the Muncipality of Kendari. Primary data are collected through open and closed questions, whereas the secondary ones are collected from some relevant documents. Every head of Local Government Agencies in each locus becomes the respondents of this research. Data are analyzed by triangulation method, and the results are measured by the achievement level of policy implementation based on five indicators above. After that, all results are categorized into three levels: Low Level (ranging from 0 to 1.00), Modest Level (ranging from 1.01 to 2.00),
and High Level (ranging from 2.01 to 3.00). This study shows that the achievement level of policy performance in the District of Konawe and Muncipality of Kendari lies at the Modest Level. Furthermore, the study reveals some critical issues in the implementation of the policy: need for surveillance
program from central government, political interests, administrative constraints, lack of resources (financial, apparatus, infrastructure), and cultural constrictions. To solve the problems, collaboration among central, provincial and local governments becomes a necessity in aligning the policy.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Ackoff, Rusell L. 1974. Redesigning the Future: System
Approach to Societal Problems. New York: John Wiley.
Bullock III, Charles S., James E. Anderson and David W.
Brady. 1983. Public Policy in the Eighties. Monterery,
CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Dunn, William N. 1981. An Introduction to Public Policy,
Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall. Inc.
__________. 2000. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Edisi
kedua. Diterjemahkan oleh Samodra Wibawa, Diah
Asitadani, Agus Heruanto Hadna, Erwan Agus
Purwanto. Penyunting: Muhadjir Darwin,
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Dye, Thomas R. 1978. Understanding Public Policy,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall. Inc.
House, Peter and Joseph Coleman. 1980. “Realities of Public
Policy Analysis†dalam Stuart S. Negel (ed) Improving
Policy Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage Publication, 1980.
Jones, Charles O. 1976. Policy Analysis: Academic Utility for
Practical Rhetoric, Policy Studies Journal Vol. 4, 1976.
__________. Public Policy, 1996. Diterjemahkan oleh Nasir
Budiman, Pengantar Kebijaksanaan Publik, Jakarta:
PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996
Mustopadidjaja AR. 1992. Studi Kebijaksanaan, Perkembangan
dan Penerapannya dalam rangka Administrasi dan
Manajemen Pembangunan. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit
FEUI.
__________. 1999. Manajemen Proses Kebijakan (Bahan
Kuliah Diklat SPAMEN dan SPATI), Lembaga
Administrasi Negara, Jakarta. 1999.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Report
(OECD, 1995)
Suaib, Eka. 1998. Proses Kebijaksanaan Publik di Indonesia,
Manajemen Pembangunan, No. 24/VII, Agustus 1998.
Wijaya, Andy Fefta. 2009. “Strengthening Governance of
Water Service Delivery (The Indonesian Case Study)â€
dalam Sharif As-Saber, Amita Singh, Raza Ahmad
dan Jennifer Jalal (Editor), Strengthening Governance
in Asia – Pasific; Myths, Realities and Paradoxes (hal. 17-
. India: Macmillan Publishers India.
Dokumen Peraturan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2004 tentang
Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang
Pemerintahan Daerah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 84
Tahun 2000 Tentang Pedoman Organisasi Perangkat
Daerah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 8
Tahun 2003 Tentang Pedoman Organisasi Perangkat
Daerah.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 41
Tahun 2007 Tentang Organisasi Perangkat Daerah.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 57 Tahun 2007
Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penataan Organisasi
Perangkat Daerah.
Peraturan Daerah Kota Kendari Tahun 2008 yang
mengatur tentang organisasi dan tata kerja
perangkat daerah Pemerintah Kota Kendari.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Konawe Tahun 2008 dan
yang mengatur tentang organisasi dan tata
kerja perangkat daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten
Konawe.
Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara.
Evaluasi Kelembagaan Perangkat Daerah.
Pusat Kajian Kinerja Kelembagaan-Lembaga
Administrasi Negara. 2006. Laporan Kajian Efisiensi
dan Efektivitas Kelembagaan Pemerintah, Jakarta:
PKKK-LAN.
Pusat Kajian dan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparatur I
(PKP2A I)-Lembaga Administrasi Negara. 2009.
Kajian Evaluasi Kinerja Kebijakan Pendayagunaan
Aparatur Negara Pada Era Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu;
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 41 Tahun 2007 Tentang
Organisasi Perangkat Daerah. Jatinangor - Sumedang.