DEKONSENTRASI DAN DESENTRALISASI DALAM DISKURSUS NEGARA KESATUAN DAN NEGARA FEDERAL
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
There is no general agreement among scholars on the degree of decentralization in a certain country. There is also disagreement whether unitary states tend to be more centralized while federal states are likely more decentralized. Yet, comparing unitary and federal states in implementing decentralization and its variants is always interesting. This paper elaborates the nature of unitary and federal states, then explores some practical aspects on the implementation of decentralization in each type of state.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Ansell, Christopher, and Jane Gingrich, 2003, “Chapter
: Trends in Decentralizationâ€, dalam Bruce E Cain;
Russell J Dalton; Susan E Scarrow, Democracy
transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities
in Advanced Industrial Democracies, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Dalam konteks Indonesia, nilai utama desentralisasi asimetris menurut Mas'ud Said (Partal Rakyat Aceh, 2007) adalah demokrasi sekaligus memperkuat
NKRI. Artinya, posisi baru asimetris bagi beberapa provinsi akan membawa perubahan dari posisi subjek disintegrasi menjadi tameng integrasi.
Azfar, Omar, Satu Kähkönen, Anthony Lanyi, Patrick
Meagher, and Diana Rutherford, 1999,
Decentralization, Governance and Public Services,
The Impact Of Institutional Arrangements: A Review
of the Literature, IRIS Center, University of
Maryland, College Park. September.
Baldi, Brunetta, 1999, Beyond the Federal-Unitary
Dichotomy, Working paper, Institute of
Governmental Studies, University of California,
Berkeley.
Basta, Lidija R., tanpa tahun, Decentralization – Key
Issues, Major Trends and Future Developments,
Columbia University webpage. Swiss Agency for
Development Cooperation http://www.ciesin.
columbia.edu/decentralization/English/Gener
al/SDC_Keyissues.html
Buchanan, James M., 1995, “Federalism as an Ideal
Political Order and an Objective for Constitutional
Reformâ€, in Publius, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Spring).
Oxford University Press.
Budiardjo, Miriam, 1983, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik,
Jakarta: Gramedia.
Chien, Shiuh-Shen, 2007, “Institutional innovations,
asymmetric decentralization, and local economic
development: a case study of Kunshan, in post-Mao
Chinaâ€, dalam Environment and Planning C:
Government and Policy. Vol. 25.
Cohon, Adam J., 2009, The Origin of Federal and Unitary
in Newly Independent Latin America: Colombia and
Venezuela. Paper presented at the 67th Annual
National Conference of the MPSA, Chicago, IL,
A p r i l 2 . U C B e r k e l e y .
http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_a
pa_research_citation/3/6/2/4/1/pages362413
/p362413-1.php
Devas, Nick, 2005, The Challenges of Decentralization,
paper presented at Global Forum on Fighting
Corruption. BrasÃlia, June. Diakses tanggal 22
A p r i l 2 0 0 9 :
http://bvc.cgu.gov.br/bitstream/123456789/2
/1/nickdevas-2.pdf.
Elazar, Daniel J., 1997, “Contrasting Unitary and Federal
Systemsâ€, dalam International Political Science
Review / Revue internationale de science
politique, Vol. 18, No. 3, Sage Publications.
Fleurke, Frederik and Rudie Hulst, 2006, “A
Contingency Approach to Decentralizationâ€, dalam
Public Organization Review, Vol. 6. Springer
Science + Business Media.
Fritzen, Scott A. and Patrick W. O. Lim, 2006, Problems
and Prospects of Decentralization In Developing
Countries, LKY School of Public Policy, National
University of Singapore, May.
Goldsmith, Mike and Ken Newton, 1983, “Central-local
government relations: The irresistible rise of
centralized powerâ€, dalam West European Politics,
Vol. 6 No. 4.
Jeffery, Charlie, and Daniel Wincott, 2006, “Devolution
in the United Kingdom: Statehood and Citizenship in
Transitionâ€, dalam Publius: TheJournal of
Federalism, Vol. 36 No. 1. Oxford University
Press.
Jeffery, Charlie, 2009, “Devolution in the United
Kingdom: Problems of a Piecemeal Approach to
Constitutional Changeâ€, dalam Publius:
TheJournal of Federalism, Vol. 39 No. 2. Oxford
University Press.
Matsuzato, Kimitaka, 2001, “From communist boss
politics to postcommunist caciquismo – the
meso-elite and meso-governments in postcommunist
countriesâ€, dalam Communist and
Post-Communist Studies No. 34. University of
California: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Prasojo, Eko, 2008, Konstruksi Ulang Hubungan
Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah di
Ind one s i a : Ant a r a Sent r i p e t a l i sme d an
Sentrifugalisme, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar
Tetap dalam Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Jakarta:
FISIP-UI.
___________, 2005, Federalisme dan Negara Federal,
Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi, FISIPUI.
Premaratne, Eranthi, 2003, Sri Lanka: From a Unitary to a
Federal State. Paper presented at the Euro Regions
Summer University, Institute of Federalism,
University of Fribourg, Switzerland. 25th August
– 12th September 2003.
Ryan, Jeffrey J., 2004, “Decentralization and Democratic
Instability: The Case of Costa Ricaâ€, dalam Public
Administration Review, Vol. 64, Issue 1 –
January.
SDC Decentralization Team, 2001, Guide to
Decentralization, Swiss Agency for Development
and Cooperation, Federal Department of Foreign
Affairs.
Tillin, Louise, 2006, “United in Diversity? Asymmetry in
Indian Federalismâ€, dalam Publius: TheJournal of
Federalism, Volume 37 Number 1. Oxford
University Press.
Wagner, Richard, 2001, “Chapter 2: Competitive
Federalism in Institutional Perspectiveâ€, dalam
Racheter, Donald P. and Richard Wagner, ed.
Federalist Government in Principle and Practice.
K l u w e r A c a d e m i c P u b l i s h e r
http://www.limitedgovernment.org/books/fe
deralist_gov.html
Wibbels, Erik, 2000, “Federalism and the Politics of
Macroeconomic Policy and Performanceâ€, dalam
American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44,
No. 4 (October). Midwest Political Science
Association.
Work, Robertson, 2002, Overview of Decentralization
Worldwide: A Stepping Stone to Improved
Governance and Human Development, UNDP: 2nd
International Conference on Decentralization
Federalism: The Future of Decentralizing States?