Indigeneous Public Administration: Melihat Administrasi Publik dari Perspektif Kearifan Lokal (Local Wisdom)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Global transformation is always demands a good governance system and one of the functions that must be run is public administration’s system. The impact of powerfull globalization stream, should be anticipated as well as possible. Public Administration with the values of western modernity that developed today, sometimes make us glare about the progress and forget the values’s identity of local wisdom that we have. Whereas, Public Administration that appropriate with the local wisdom will be no less great than western Public Administration’s model. This paper critically discusses the concept of public administration based on local wisdom (Indigenous) and tried to critize the western of public administration’s models which has been predicated in practice and viewed as the core study of contemporary public administration in various country, including Indonesia. A review and reconstruction of ideas, concepts and theories on Government and Governance. The main issues is that it is not always the western model administrative practice was able to solve the problem of public administration and was successfully implemented in various regions in responding the local culture.
Keywords: Public Administration, Local Wisdom, Indigenious
Â
ABSTRAK
Â
Transformasi global senantiasa menuntut adanya sistem pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) dan salah satu fungsi yang harus dijalankan adalah sistem administrasi publik. Dampak dari arus globalisasi yang sedemikian kuat, sudah seharusnya diantisipasi sebaik mungkin. Dimana administrasi publik dengan nilai-nilai modernitas model barat (western) yang berkembang saat ini, terkadang membuat kita silau akan kemajuan sehingga melupakan identitas nilai-nilai kearifan lokal yang kita miliki. Padahal administrasi publik yang beridentitas sesuai dengan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal tak akan kalah hebatnya jika dibanding dengan administrasi publik model barat. Paper ini secara kritis mendiskusikan tentang konsep administrasi publik yang berbasis kearifan lokal yang lebih bersifat indigenous dan mencoba mengkritik administrasi publik model barat yang selama ini digadang-gadangkan dalam praktik dan dipandang sebagai core studi dari administrasi publik kontemporer diberbagai negara termasuk di Indonesia. Sebuah pengkajian ulang dan pendeskonstruksian ide, konsep dan teori terhadap Government dan Governance. Thesis utamanya adalah bahwa tidak selamanya praktik administrasi model barat mampu menyelesaikan masalah administrasi publik dan berhasil dilaksanakan diberbagai daerah dalam merespon budaya lokal.
Kata Kunci: Administrasi Publik, Kearifan Lokal, Indigenous
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Public Administration: Three Problems†Public Administration Review 7 (Winter). London: Yale University Press.
Drechsler, W., 2013. ‘Three paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western, and Islamic’, Society and Economy, 35 (3), 319–42.
Henderson, Keith M., 2004. Characterizing American public administrationThe concept of administrative culture. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 17 (3) pp. 234-250. Emerald Insight.
Hoadley, Mason C., 2006. Quo Vadis Administrasi Negara Indonesia Antara Kultur Lokal dan Struktur Barat. Yogyakarka: Graha Ilmu.
Ortiz, James., 2002. Tribal Governance and Public Administration. Journal Administration & Society, Vol. 34 (5) pp. 459-481. SAGE Publications.
Raymond, Foxworth., 2015. Indigenous Autonomy and Well-Being: Resources, Participation And Institutions. ProQuest LLC.
Riggs, W.F., 1979. ‘The Ecology of Administrative Development’, the International Conference on the Future of Public Administration, the University of Quebec, May 27-31, 1979.
Sam, Sofjan Alizar., 2014. Kegagalan Modernisasi Pembangunan di Indonesia (sebuah Prespektif). Jurnal UNIERA Volume 3 (1), 105-111.
Suripto, dkk., 2017. “Indigeneous Public Administration: Suatu Pengkajian Ulang dan Pendekonstruksian Ide, Konsep, dan Teori Government dan Governance†Laporan Desiminasi Penelitian Hibah Departemen. Yogyakarta: Departemen MKP FISIPOL UGM.
Wibawa, Samodra., 2001. Negara-Negara Di Nusantara Dari Negara-Kota hingga Negara-Bangsa dari Modrenisasi hingga reformasi Administrasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Wikantiyoso, Respati. 2009. Kearifan Lokal Dalam Perencanaan dan Perancangan Kota Untuk Mewujudkan Arsitektur Kota yang Berkelanjutan. Malang: Group Konservasi Arsitektur & Kota.